🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are watching closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a increasing chorus of nations are exploring parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader stating that phones and apps are "taking away our kids' childhood". The policy may be passed next year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to verify the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential measures under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has urged lawmakers to enact a bill raising the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory motion demanding a ban for minors except if guardian approval is provided. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these services, the step does not establish binding law.

"A strong age restriction is a useful foundation," stated the MEP behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "nothing is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Last year, momentum built behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. However, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have expressed concerns. One foundation founded by the family of a girl who took her own life after viewing harmful social media material argues that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when users turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the tech sector to design products and services that are safe and fit for young users," commented a prominent online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, legislation is largely occurring at the regional level amid national gridlock.

• Utah requires guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has passed a measure banning children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has approved a regulation limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with any further use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted laws demanding parental consent for teenagers to open social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from various figures to follow this lead, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Apart from Europe and the US, further nations are similarly considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international bodies adopt a more nuanced tone. A major UN agency has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "may even have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable young people and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

While this global debate continues, the actions of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers globally are no longer willing to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.